Form OTN-1 · Register
Loading the Register.
Form OTN-2
Get the
new issue.
Monthly intel on jurisdictions, structures, and entity strategy for builders in crypto and tech.
Form OTN-1 · Register
Loading the Register.
Form OTN-2
Monthly intel on jurisdictions, structures, and entity strategy for builders in crypto and tech.
Form OTN-3 · Entry of record
Register / Newsletter / Entry OTN-2023-026
This is to certify that the entry
was filed in the Register on 29 September 2023, under the jurisdiction Newsletter.
Standfirst
This month's issue of The Otonomist is all about how we iterated on ICOs in a legit way for Otonomos' own funding round, and its terms and structure.
It has been said that venture capital is the least scaleable of all businesses.
For VCs, even when they invest in tech companies, participating in a round is still a very low-tech process. Think MS Word term sheets, analog deal dox and clunky fiat wires.
For Founders, raising money means knocking on countless investor doors, resulting in (mostly) rejections and (at best) a handful of one-sided term sheets, followed by parallel negotiations and dragged-out due dil, in a process that makes Founders feel their valuation is being auctioned off whilst their business is drowning.
For smaller investors, they simply do not count…

Back in the days, ICOs were an almost visceral reaction from the crypto community seeking to change the way Web3 projects received funding.
Some were idealistic, most were opportunistic, and almost all involved a dumpster-fire of existing regs.
Since, we’ve gone through a whole alphabet of token distribution models, but the pendulum seems to have swung back to opaque SAFT, SAFE or SAFT/E rounds or traditional offline equity rounds funded by centralized capital, with tokens thrown in almost as an afterthought.
Is there a way to preserve the spontaneity of ICOs when raising equity without offending Gary and his regulatory peers?
It’s a challenge many in the community, including Coinbase’s Brian Armstrong (9.17s into his clip on X), would like to see addressed.
In this Funding Special, we share what Otonomos has been working on to solve the capital formation challenge as one of the biggest obstacles for Founders (and investors!).
Quoted from the entry
“In Part I , we talk about what features a tech-centric equity funding solution should have.”
— Otonomos, 29 September 2023
Quoted from the entry
“In Part II , we walk readers through Otonomos’ raise and the use of the online funding portal it built to make participation in its equity round frictionless.”
— Otonomos, 29 September 2023
The way we started out examining the features for an equity funding solution, we asked ourselves how how it would look like if God designed it, taking into account existing man-made regs which even He won’t be able to change so soon...
We believe such godsend design would have the following 10 features:
In Part I of this Funding Special, we discuss each of the above 10 design commandments in more detail and illustrate how we built them into our technology solution by using screenshots of Otonomos’ own funding portal.
Read full post
In a second part, we share how we put our own round together and walk you through our online funding portal, with the idea to:
Quoted from the entry
“Read our full post to get all details on why we raise, on what terms, and how to participate.”
— Otonomos, 29 September 2023
Read now
ANNOUNCEMENT
NEXT MONTH: In next month’s issue ofThe Otonomist, we will have two guest contributors and report back on progress on both the Otonomos and OtoCo tech development side.
Form OTN-2
Monthly intel on jurisdictions, structures, and entity strategy for builders in crypto and tech.
End of entry OTN-2023-026
Filed by Otonomos
![]() |
| The Otonomist May 2025 Issue Welcome to this May issue of The Otonomist, our monthly missive with posts on how to build in Web3 and how Otonomos can help you start your business in crypto and tech. |
| 01 |
| Filed |